Nothing on this site is intended for human or veterinary use. PeptideBasics101 exists for general awareness: it collects publicly available information from across the internet and keeps it in one place for research and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here is medical advice. Statements here are our summaries of public sources and have not been reviewed or endorsed by the FDA or any regulatory body. This is information gathering, not guidance.

PeptideBasics101

peptide

AOD-9604

A lab-made piece of human growth hormone tested as a weight-loss pill; it failed its main trial and was never approved.

A modified 16-amino-acid fragment of human growth hormone developed in Australia as an oral anti-obesity drug; its Phase 2b trial failed in 2007, it was never approved, and FDA advisers voted 12–0 in 2024 against adding it to the list of ingredients pharmacies may compound.

Data refreshed 2026-11-01 · Based on 8 published references

At a glance

FDA approved
No.
Potential results
  • No clear weight loss vs placebo (large trial)
  • Small weight loss in one short study (summary only, not fully published)
  • Less knee cartilage damage in rabbits (animal study only)

Unverified, online reports only: fat loss, including reducing weight, waist size and fat under the chin.

Dose
Study doses: see the Scientific view
Converter: mg, mL and syringe units
Storage
Powder: fridge (2–8 °C) for the short term, freezer (−20 °C) for the long term; after mixing, fridge for up to 28 days (general guidance, not tested for this compound).
Side effects and warnings
  • Taken by mouth in company trials, the most common side effects were headache, diarrhoea and gas. These were more common at 54 mg.
  • Given into a vein, people had headache, tiredness and dizziness. One person had severe chest tightness. Some felt unusually happy (euphoria). These two were judged possibly linked to the drug.
  • Five people in the 12-week study got cancers (skin cancers, breast cancer, melanoma) or a fatty lump (lipoma). The researcher judged these unrelated, but the FDA listed them as possible safety issues.

A summary of the sources on this page, not medical advice.

What else trials studied for weight loss, blood sugar and metabolism: see the research quiz.

Names

Also called: AOD9604, Tyr-hGH(177-191), hGH fragment 177-191 with N-terminal tyrosine, AOD-9604 acetate, LAT8881

Regulatory (US)

FDA approval: none

503A compounding: unknown
Not on any FDA compounding list; see Regulatory picture.

Molecule

Formula: C78H123N23O23S2

MW: 1815.1 g/mol

CAS: 221231-10-3

PubChem entry

Sequence: Tyr-Leu-Arg-Ile-Val-Gln-Cys-Arg-Ser-Val-Glu-Gly-Ser-Cys-Gly-Phe (disulfide bond between Cys7 and Cys14)

Origin

Discovered by: Frank Ng and colleagues, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne

Developer: Metabolic Pharmaceuticals (Melbourne), later a subsidiary of Calzada Ltd

What it is

AOD-9604 is a lab-made piece of human growth hormone. Growth hormone is a large protein. Scientists thought one small part at its tail end did the fat-burning. They hoped this part would work without affecting growth or blood sugar.

AOD-9604 copies 15 amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) from that tail. It adds one more at the front, making 16 in total. That makes it a short chain of amino acids (a peptide).

It was made in Australia in the late 1990s and 2000s. The goal was a pill for obesity. In mice, it cut body fat. In people, the company’s largest trial found no real weight loss compared with a dummy treatment (placebo). Work on it for obesity stopped in 2007.

It is not an approved medicine anywhere. It is also not the same as the peptide sold as “HGH fragment 176-191”. That one has a different first amino acid.

AOD-9604 is Tyr-hGH(177–191): residues 177–191 of human growth hormone with an added N-terminal tyrosine (Tyr-Leu-Arg-Ile-Val-Gln-Cys-Arg-Ser-Val-Glu-Gly-Ser-Cys-Gly-Phe), cyclised by a disulfide bond between Cys7 and Cys14 (C78H123N23O23S2, 1815.1 g/mol, CAS 221231-10-3).

The rationale was that lipolytic activity of hGH resides in its C-terminus, separable from receptor-mediated growth-promoting and diabetogenic effects. In obese rodents AOD-9604 reduced lipogenesis and increased lipolysis and fat oxidation, without the hyperglycaemia or insulin resistance seen with hGH. Heffernan et al. (2001) found that it increased β3-adrenergic receptor expression in adipose tissue, but that its chronic effects were absent in β3-AR knockout mice while acute fat oxidation persisted, so the mechanism was not resolved. No receptor has been identified, and the sponsor’s trials reported no change in IGF-1.

Pharmacokinetics are known only from animals: in pigs, intravenous AOD-9604 had a half-life of about 3 minutes, while oral dosing at 2 mg/kg produced a plasma peak at about 60 minutes (Moré and Kenley, 2014). Human pharmacokinetic data have not been published.

Who made it and when

The peptide came from Frank Ng’s lab at Monash University in Melbourne. His lab studied the fat-burning part of growth hormone. A Melbourne company, Metabolic Pharmaceuticals, developed and patented it in the late 1990s. It ran several human trials in the 2000s, mostly with tablets taken by mouth.

The main obesity trial failed in 2007. After that, the company (later part of Calzada Ltd) looked for other ways to sell it. In 2012 it said a panel of experts it hired had called AOD-9604 “generally recognised as safe” for use in food. This was the company’s own paid-for opinion. It was not an FDA decision. The company also patented uses for joint wear-and-tear (osteoarthritis) and cartilage repair.

Ng and colleagues at Monash reported the lipolytic and antilipogenic actions of synthetic hGH C-terminal fragments: AOD-9401 (Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000) and AOD-9604 (Horm Res 2000, in obese Zucker rats; Int J Obes and Endocrinology 2001, in mice). Metabolic Pharmaceuticals ran six randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (METAOD001–006), summarised by company-affiliated authors in Stier et al. (2013).

On 2012-06-25 Calzada announced a “conditional self-affirmed GRAS” determination by an expert panel it convened, for food use at up to 1 mg per person per day, conditional on publishing its safety data (published 2013–2014). A self-affirmed GRAS conclusion is the company’s own determination and is not reviewed or affirmed by FDA; FDA’s 2024 evaluation, which searched the GRAS Notice Inventory, did not cite any FDA GRAS notice for AOD-9604. Metabolic Pharmaceuticals holds US 10,111,933 and US 10,758,593, both titled “Use of growth hormone fragments”, with 2011 priority, covering osteoarthritis, cartilage and connective-tissue uses. Published cartilage data come from a rabbit osteoarthritis model (Kwon and Park, 2015).

What the data say

In fat mice and rats, AOD-9604 cut weight gain and body fat. It did not raise blood sugar. That was the original hope.

In people, the results did not hold up. Early small studies showed signs of more fat breakdown in the blood. But they found no clear weight loss.

A 12-week study of 300 people said weight loss was a little faster on the lowest dose. But only a short conference summary was ever published.

The largest trial had 536 people over 24 weeks, with diet and exercise. It found no real difference from placebo. The company then stopped.

The FDA found no human study of it as a shot under the skin or as a skin cream. Those are the forms proposed for pharmacy-made versions. In 2024 the FDA said there was not enough proof that it works for obesity.

Animal data: in obese Zucker rats, oral AOD-9604 500 µg/kg daily for 19 days reduced body weight gain by over 50% (Ng et al., Horm Res 2000). In ob/ob mice, 14 days by osmotic minipump or intraperitoneal injection reduced weight gain by about 5–10%, with increased fat oxidation and plasma glycerol and no change in glucose or insulin (Heffernan et al., 2001).

Human data (all oral or intravenous, as summarised in FDA’s 2024 review): METAOD002 (n=23, single IV doses 25–100 µg/kg) raised non-esterified fatty acids without significant weight loss. METAOD003 (n=16–17, oral 9–54 mg) and METAOD004 (n=36, oral 9–54 mg for 7 days) showed no significant weight loss. METAOD005 (n=300, oral 1–30 mg daily for 12 weeks) was reported only as an abstract: 0.22 kg per week at 1 mg versus 0.07 kg per week on placebo. OPTIONS/METAOD006 (536 enrolled, 502 randomised, oral 0.25–1 mg daily for 24 weeks) was powered to detect a 1.8 kg difference and did not reach significance at 12 or 24 weeks.

FDA concluded that in most of the studies it reviewed AOD-9604 did not reduce weight more than placebo, and found no human data for the subcutaneous or transdermal routes proposed for compounding.

Regulatory picture

There are three separate points here.

Approval: No medicine with AOD-9604 is approved by the FDA or any other regulator.

Pharmacy-made versions (compounding): In September 2023 the FDA put AOD-9604 on its “Category 2” list. This list is for ingredients with safety concerns for pharmacy mixing. The pharmacies that asked for it withdrew their requests. So in September 2024 the FDA took it off that list. But the FDA still reviewed it. In December 2024 an FDA expert panel voted 12 to 0. They voted against adding it to the list of ingredients pharmacies may use. It was also not among the six peptides in the US health department’s October 2026 draft policy easing enforcement.

Food use: The 2012 “safe for food” claim came from the company itself. It was not an FDA finding.

Sport: It is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency. An Australian Crime Commission report named it among peptides given to athletes.

Approval: none. Development for obesity was terminated on 2007-02-21, and no IND-stage programme has been verified since. No study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Compounding: AOD-9604 entered 503A Category 2 on 2023-09-29 and was removed on 2024-09-27 after the nominations (Wells Pharmacy and the International Peptide Society) were withdrawn. FDA evaluated AOD-9604 (free base) and AOD-9604 acetate on its own initiative for obesity and proposed not adding them, citing poor physicochemical characterisation, missing endotoxin data for injectables, immunogenicity concerns, lack of efficacy and limited safety data. On 2024-12-04 the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted 0 yes, 12 no, 0 abstain. It is not on the 503A bulks list in 21 CFR 216.23. No final FDA rule on AOD-9604 was found, and it is not among the six peptides covered by the HHS draft enforcement-discretion policy of 2026-10-30, so this article records compounding status as unknown.

Food: the 2012 GRAS determination was self-affirmed by a company-convened panel; no FDA review of it was found.

Sport and Australia: FDA’s review notes that WADA lists AOD-9604 under S2 (peptide hormones, growth factors and related substances), that the Australian Crime Commission reported its supply to athletes, and that Australia’s Advisory Committee on Medicines Scheduling recommended adding it to the Poisons Standard as a performance- and image-enhancing drug.

Dose

Doses reported in trials and studies

How dosing worked in the studies

In human studies, AOD-9604 was given by mouth or into a vein. A 12-week study had 300 adults with obesity, about 50 per group. They took 1, 5, 10, 20 or 30 mg once a day, or a dummy treatment (placebo), after a 2-week lead-in. In the OPTIONS Phase 2b trial, 536 adults aged 18–65 with BMI 30–45 signed up. Of these, 502 were assigned by chance to a group. They took 0.25, 0.5 or 1 mg once a day, or placebo, for 24 weeks. They also followed a diet and exercise plan. Earlier small safety studies in men compared the drug with placebo. Some used one 20-minute drip into a vein (25 to 400 µg/kg). Others used capsules of 9, 27 or 54 mg, either once or daily for 7 days.

Doses used in the studies are in the Scientific view.

Study doses are not personal dosing instructions. Reading doses safely: how concentration and syringe markings work.

Doses reported in studies, exactly as the cited trial reported them. They are not personal dosing instructions. Population, route and schedule matter more than the number.

TrialPhaseStatusPopulationDoseResult
12-week oral dose-ranging study (Metabolic Pharmaceuticals; not registered on ClinicalTrials.gov)
METAOD005
2Completed (reported as a 2005 conference abstract; no full publication)300 adults with obesity, about 50 per groupOral AOD-9604 1, 5, 10, 20 or 30 mg once daily, or placebo, for 12 weeks after a 2-week run-inAbstract reported weight loss of 0.22 kg/week at 1 mg vs 0.07 kg/week on placebo, with a non-linear dose response; FDA noted the abstract gave too little data to interpret. Five participants had serious adverse events (skin cancers, breast cancer, melanoma, lipoma) judged unrelated by the investigator
OPTIONS Phase 2b (not registered on ClinicalTrials.gov)
OPTIONS (METAOD006)
2bCompleted; obesity development terminated February 2007536 adults aged 18–65 with BMI 30–45 enrolled, 502 randomisedOral AOD-9604 0.25, 0.5 or 1 mg once daily, or placebo, for 24 weeks, with a dietitian-supervised diet and exercise programmeWeight loss versus placebo was too small to reach statistical significance at the 12-week primary endpoint or at 24 weeks; Metabolic Pharmaceuticals ended development for obesity (company announcement, 21 February 2007)

Doses in other published studies

Published studies not listed in the trials table above: smaller or unregistered human studies first, then animal and cell studies. Doses are shown exactly as each study reported them. Animal studies report weight-based doses, absolute amounts or concentrations; none translates directly to people, and none is converted here.

SubjectsDesignDoseFindingSource
Humans: 15 healthy adult men with BMI 24-30 kg/m2 (METAOD001) and 23 healthy, clinically obese men with BMI >=35 kg/m2 (METAOD002)Two double-blind, placebo-controlled single-dose intravenous safety studies (METAOD001 Phase I dose escalation with a single IV rhGH 0.12 IU/kg positive control; METAOD002 Phase IIa 4-sequence, 4-period Williams Latin square), summarised by sponsor-affiliated authorsMETAOD001: 3 single dosages of AOD9604 (range 25 to 400 µg/kg bodyweight) and placebo, each a single IV infusion over 20 minutes, separated by a 7-day washout period. METAOD002: 4 single doses (25, 50 and 100 µg/kg AOD9604 or placebo), each a single IV infusion over 20 minutes, separated by a 7-day washout periodMETAOD001 reported 29 adverse events in 12 subjects, headache being the most common (6 events), with no serious adverse events and no significant glycerol, glucose or IGF-1 trends; in METAOD002 mild or moderate headache was reported by 16 of 23 subjects, one severe episode of chest tightness was judged possibly related, and mild or moderate euphoria judged possibly related was reported by 5 of 23 subjects during AOD9604 periods.Stier H et al., Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2013
Humans: 17 healthy, clinically obese men with BMI >=35 kg/m2 (METAOD003) and 36 healthy, clinically obese men with BMI >=30 kg/m2 (METAOD004)Two Phase IIa double-blind, placebo-controlled oral safety studies: single-dose 4x4 Latin square (METAOD003) and randomised 7-day multiple-dose study with 9 subjects per group (METAOD004), summarised by sponsor-affiliated authorsMETAOD003: single oral capsule doses of 9, 27 and 54 mg AOD9604 or placebo, each dose separated by a 2-week washout period. METAOD004: 9, 27 or 54 mg AOD9604 or placebo orally (capsules) daily for 7 days, followed by a 7-day follow-upIn METAOD003 headache followed by digestive events (diarrhoea, flatulence, increased appetite, nausea) were the most common adverse events and one serious adverse event (diarrhoea at 54 mg) was judged possibly related; in METAOD004 there were no serious adverse events, subjects on 54 mg had more headaches, diarrhoea and flatulence, fasting glucose and insulin were unchanged, and IGF-1 showed no apparent difference between groups.Stier H et al., Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2013
Rats: Sprague-Dawley, 10 males and 10 females per dose group (vehicle control 5 per sex)4-week intravenous repeat-dose toxicity study with incorporated bone marrow micronucleus assay, conducted to GLP by a contract laboratory (report dated July 2002), vehicle-controlled; summarised by sponsor-affiliated authors0.1, 1.0 or 10 mg/kg AOD9604/day IV to the caudal vein, at the same time each day, for 4 weeksGroup mean body mass gain was significantly reduced in females at 1.0 and 10.0 mg/kg/day and males at 10 mg/kg/day had significantly reduced thymus masses; a slight micronucleus increase at 0.1 and 10 but not 1 mg/kg lacked a dose relationship and was not interpreted by the authors as evidence of chromosomal damage.Moré MI et al., Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2014
Rats: Han Wistar, 12 per sex per group; Monkeys: cynomolgus, 7 per sex per group (3 per sex killed at an interim 13 weeks)Chronic oral gavage toxicology studies, 26 weeks in rats and 9 months (39 weeks) in monkeys, vehicle-controlled (PEG-400); summarised by sponsor-affiliated authorsRats: 0, 0.5, 20 and 100 mg AOD9604/kg/day by oral gavage once daily for 26 weeks. Monkeys: 0, 0.5, 10 or 50 mg AOD9604/kg/day by oral gavage for 9 months (39 weeks)The authors reported a no-observed-adverse-effect level of at least 100 mg/kg/day in rats and up to 50 mg/kg/day in monkeys, judging the lymphocyte, blood chemistry and liver differences seen to be of no toxicological importance because they lacked dose relationships or corroborating pathology, and no significant anti-AOD9604 antibody levels were detected.Moré MI et al., Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2014
Rabbits: 32 mature New Zealand white rabbits with collagenase-induced knee osteoarthritisControlled four-group animal study (saline, hyaluronic acid, AOD9604, AOD9604 plus hyaluronic acid) using ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections; abstract only0.25 mg AOD9604 (with or without 6 mg hyaluronic acid) by intra-articular injection weekly, administered for 4-7 weeks after the first intra-articular collagenase injection (as worded in the abstract)Mean gross morphological and histopathological cartilage scores were significantly higher in the saline group than in the other three groups and significantly lower with AOD9604 plus hyaluronic acid than with either agent alone, and the combination group had the shortest lameness period.Kwon DR, Park GY, Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, 2015
Cells: Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100) and E. coli WP2 uvrA; Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cellsIn vitro genotoxicity studies conducted to GLP: bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test and chromosome aberration assay, with and without S-9 metabolic activation; summarised by sponsor-affiliated authorsAmes: 0, 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1,000 and 2,000 µg AOD9604/plate (plate incorporation); 0, 8, 40, 200, 1,000 and 2,000 µg/plate (pre-incubation), with a repeat at 0, 50, 300, 500, 800 and 1,000 µg/plate (WP2 uvrA with S-9). CHO: 20, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL for 3 h (experiment 1); in experiment 2, treatment for 3 h with S-9 or 1.5 cell cycles without S-9, with 500 and 1,000 µg/mL added without S-9The authors reported no significant mutation-rate increase up to 2,000 µg/plate (a slight WP2 uvrA increase at 200 and 1,000 µg/plate with S-9 was not reproduced) and no clastogenicity in CHO cells, although dose-related growth inhibition and increased polyploidy at the two top concentrations without S-9 were observed.Moré MI et al., Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2014

Mixing examples reported by protocol websites

Examples for the freeze-dried powder, as reported by protocol websites, not taken from studies. The water amount only sets the concentration (how much is in each mL); it does not change how much of the compound is in the vial. Each concentration assumes the vial really holds its labelled amount and the final liquid volume equals the water added.

VialWater addedConcentration
5 mg1 mL5,000 mcg/mL
5 mg2 mL2,500 mcg/mL
5 mg3 mL1,667 mcg/mL
  1. Clean the rubber tops of both vials with an alcohol swab.
  2. Add the water slowly, letting it run down the inside wall of the vial rather than onto the powder.
  3. Swirl or roll gently until the powder dissolves; protocol sites advise against shaking.
  4. The liquid should be clear. If it is cloudy or has specks in it, do not use it. Clear liquid does not show that the product is pure, the right strength or sterile.
  5. Write the date and the concentration on the vial, and keep it in the fridge (2–8 °C). No safe storage time after mixing has been established for these products.

Products sold as "research peptides" have not gone through FDA review for safety, effectiveness or quality. Bacteriostatic water does not sterilize a contaminated powder. It contains benzyl alcohol, and its label says it is not for use in newborns. To work out a volume from your own numbers, use the converter.

Doses described in clinical or compounding practice

From FDA labels and documents, other regulators, published reviews and professional references, as each source states them. Unless a source says otherwise, these describe practice or proposals, not results tested in trials. Reading doses safely: how concentration and syringe markings work.

Doses reported in online communities (untested)

Unverified, and not a recommendation. These are amounts people describe in online forums such as Reddit, collected so researchers can see how practice differs from the evidence. These forum accounts are not clinical evidence, even where they overlap studied doses. Products sold online as "research peptides" are not FDA approved, and their identity, purity and strength are not verified; they can be mislabeled, contaminated or wrongly dosed.

What people report

In the threads reviewed, people described injecting about 150 to 500 mcg once daily or 250 to 300 mcg twice daily, with the route usually unstated and subcutaneous where named; one mention described nasal drops. The main disagreement was whether it works: many replies said it produced no noticeable fat loss, while a smaller number reported modest changes alongside GLP-1 drugs, L-carnitine or diet changes. Reported side effects included injection-site reactions and pain, diarrhoea, back acne, and feeling hot and sweating; some commenters mentioned the product turning gel-like.

How this compares with the studies

Published human studies used oral capsules or tablets (0.25 to 54 mg per day) and single intravenous infusions (25 to 400 µg/kg); the threads describe injection, for which no human data have been published, so community amounts cannot be compared with trial doses. In the largest oral trial, weight loss did not differ significantly from placebo. Some replies cited the sponsor's trials, but as evidence of little effect, not as a source for amounts.

Open questions a study would need to answer

Threads consulted, checked 2026-09-26: Has AOD worked for you? Reading a bunch of conflicting results (r/Peptides) · Is AOD actually doing anything for you guys, or am I expecting too much? (r/Peptides) · AOD, My first shot tday- I dont know what to expect tbh (r/Peptides) · What's your AOD dosing? (r/Peptides) · AOD and body heat? (r/Peptides) · Anyone get results from AOD-9604? (r/Peptides) · AOD-9604 for double chin?! (r/Peptides) · AOD 9604 Experience? (r/moreplatesmoredates)

Enforcement history

Side effects and warnings

Full lists are in the .

Reported side effects

Interactions

Not catalogued yet.

Contraindications

Not catalogued yet.

Storage

No approved product exists, so there is no label storage data. FDA's 2024 review notes that the disulfide bond can be reduced, leading to degradation and aggregation, and that supplier storage statements vary.

General storage guidance commonly given for freeze-dried research peptides and powders, not stability data for this substance. Storage conditions and usable life depend on the specific product and formulation; follow its documented instructions.

ConditionTemperature
Temporary (transportation), in powdered form15 °C – 25 °C / 59 °F – 77 °F
Short term (1–3 years)2 °C – 8 °C / 36 °F – 46 °F
After reconstitution (28 days)2 °C – 8 °C / 36 °F – 46 °F
Long term (2–5 years)−20 °C / −4 °F or below

Product characteristics

Form: Synthetic cyclic (disulfide-bridged) peptide; developed as an oral tablet; research grade sold as lyophilized powder, free base or acetate

Compound information

FDA's 2024 review found inconsistent CAS numbers and sequences among suppliers, with some reporting CAS 386264-39-7 for AOD-9604, and judged neither the free base nor the acetate well characterised. It is distinct from hGH fragment 176-191, which has phenylalanine (hGH residue 176) where AOD-9604 has the added tyrosine.

Molecule, patents, enforcement history, full trial tables and compound details are in the .

Patents

Common questions

What is AOD-9604?

AOD-9604 is a lab-made piece of human growth hormone. Growth hormone is a large protein. Scientists thought one small part at its tail end did the fat-burning. They hoped this part would work without affecting growth or blood sugar.

Is AOD-9604 FDA approved?

Not FDA approved for any use.

What have studies found?

How was it dosed in studies?

In human studies, AOD-9604 was given by mouth or into a vein. A 12-week study had 300 adults with obesity, about 50 per group. They took 1, 5, 10, 20 or 30 mg once a day, or a dummy treatment (placebo), after a 2-week lead-in. In the OPTIONS Phase 2b trial, 536 adults aged 18–65 with BMI 30–45 signed up. Of these, 502 were assigned by chance to a group. They took 0.25, 0.5 or 1 mg once a day, or placebo, for 24 weeks. They also followed a diet and exercise plan. Earlier small safety studies in men compared the drug with placebo. Some used one 20-minute drip into a vein (25 to 400 µg/kg). Others used capsules of 9, 27 or 54 mg, either once or daily for 7 days.

What are the side effects and warnings?

Is it legal to buy as a "research peptide"?

Products sold as "research use only" or "not for human consumption" are not approved for use in people. That label does not make them legal to sell for human use, and their contents are not checked by any regulator.

References

This page summarises the published sources below. PeptideBasics101 does no original research. Trial doses and results are reported as the cited study or label reported them. Sources can themselves be wrong or superseded; if you find a statement here that does not match its source, please tell us through our corrections process. Sources were last checked on 2026-11-01.

Based on 8 published references
  1. FDA briefing document: AOD-9604-related bulk drug substances, Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, December 4, 2024 (fda.gov)
  2. FDA final summary minutes, Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, December 4, 2024 (fda.gov)
  3. FDA: certain bulk drug substances for use in compounding that may present significant safety risks (Category 2 and withdrawn substances) (fda.gov)
  4. Heffernan M et al. The effects of human GH and its lipolytic fragment (AOD9604) on lipid metabolism following chronic treatment in obese mice and beta3-AR knock-out mice. Endocrinology 2001 (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  5. Stier H et al. Safety and tolerability of the hexadecapeptide AOD9604 in humans. J Endocrinol Metab 2013 (jofem.org)
  6. Metabolic Pharmaceuticals announcements filed with the SEC, including termination of AOD9604 obesity development (February 2007) (sec.gov)
  7. Calzada Ltd announcement: AOD9604 receives conditional self-affirmed GRAS status (June 25, 2012) (lateral-pharma.com)
  8. PubChem: AOD-9604 (CID 71300630) (pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Clinical trial entries in the table above link to their ClinicalTrials.gov registry records. Spotted an error? See corrections.

Ask Sgt. Pep